Thursday, September 24, 2009

Threatening Email; OK, Here it is, The Post you all have been waiting for.

This is where I stand folks, this is what I get after exposing lie after lie.
It's pretty obvious that we at PPE have struck a nerve and this is only one example of what I deal with behind the scenes of an opinion blog.

Being the fact that you folks will not stand for embellishments, plagiarism, and a host of other implications and conspiracy theories that our good people and our fine City has recently been accused of, this is their only recourse of action. Intimidation. I can assure I WILL NOT be bullied into backing down when it comes to exposing the truth.

Below you will read an email that I received from the owner of the website 'Blinkoncrime" Shannon Stoy... her motive is to quiet us, more like silence us, but let me say that if that website embellishes as it has on numerous occasions we will not stand by and watch it happen.

The Blinkoncrime.com owner can threaten me all she wants and if they at blinkoncrime.com had consistently uncovered the truth this would not be an issue. Yet this is no issue on my part, I WILL NOT, now, or ever stand idly by and watch anyone drag our VFD and/or LE through the mud.

Our LE has gone to every length they could muster up a resolve to this case, they have gone well above and beyond their duty, even listening on their phone to someone with a wee-jee board trying to direct the officer to a body.

If one cannot support that, well there's no hope for them. Read the email below, and discuss. Keep it respectful please!!

BTW: I want all our readers to know that I sent a return email and gave this person 24 hours to provide me with proof of their copyright to this email.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

September 21, 2009
Mr. XXXXXX XXXXX
XXX XXXXXX XX
Pocomoke City, MD 21851

VIA EMAIL AND CERTIFIED MAIL


Dear Mr. XXXXX;
I am in receipt of some entries contained in your blog, “The Pocomoke Public Eye” that are alarming, harassing, and in some instances, blatant lies. It contains requests and threats for others to openly and with malice, embarrass, harass and contact my professional contacts as well as family members. At no time have I ever publicly placed my name, professional affiliations, or personal statistics on the web.
Your blog has a moderation feature available to you. If it is your choice to post repeated anonymous vitriol, the responsibility of that content rests solely with you at this level. This applies to posts, comments; any all content published by you, whether written by you personally or submitted by named or unnamed contributor. I have addressed the copyright infringements with a notification complaint in accordance with the Digital Millenium Copyright Act through the ISP of your “blog”, separately.
To say this is a gross invasion of my privacy and is causing severe distress and concern for me, my family, and in some cases professional colleagues, is an understatement.
I note that there are a few posts about defamation and the like; Let me assure you the following laws, including, but not limited to: cyber bullying, cyber stalking and harassment make no provision for defamatory or libelous acts when they are exacted in this manner.
The state of Maryland, where you are located, provides for statutes of cyber bullying and cyber stalking under Maryland Statute 555C.
Harassment:
Harassment

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. § 3-803. Harassment. Amended 2002.

(a) Prohibited. -- A person may not follow another in or about a public place or maliciously engage in a course of conduct that alarms or seriously annoys the other:

(1) with the intent to harass, alarm, or annoy the other;

(2) after receiving a reasonable warning or request to stop by or on behalf of the other; and

(3) without a legal purpose.

(b) Exception. -- This section does not apply to a peaceable activity intended to express a political view or provide information to others.

(c) Penalty. -- A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 90 days or a fine not exceeding $ 500 or both.
Under NJ law, where I am located, this activity is clearly covered in harassment statutes, located here. It is distinct in that it is prosecutable whether the offense originates in this state, yours, or possibly the posters itself, as you can discern from the Stalking statues below.




New Jersey Stalking Law
1[1. N.J.S.2C:33-4 is amended to read as follows:
2C:33-4. Harassment.
Except as provided in subsections d. and e., a person commits a petty disorderly persons offense if, with purpose to harass another, he:
a. Makes, or causes to be made, a communication or communications anonymously or at extremely inconvenient hours, or in offensively coarse language, or any other manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm;
b. Subjects another to striking, kicking, shoving, or other offensive touching, or threatens to do so; or
c. Engages in any other course of alarming conduct or of repeatedly committed acts with purpose to alarm or seriously annoy such other person. A communication under subsection a. may be deemed to have been made either at the place where it originated or at the place where it was received. A communication under subsection a. includes but is not limited to a communication made by means of an electronic communication device. "Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, a telephone, cellular phone, computer, video recorder, fax machine, or pager.
d. A person commits a crime of the fourth degree if in committing an offense under this section, he acted with a purpose to intimidate an individual or group of individuals because of race, color, religion, gender, handicap, sexual orientation or ethnicity.
e. A person commits a crime of the fourth degree if, in committing an offense under this section, he was serving a term of imprisonment or was on parole or probation as the result of a conviction of any indictable offense under the laws of this State, any other state or the United States. (cf: P.L.1998, c.17, s.4)]1
11. N.J.S. 2C:1-14 is amended to read as follows:
2C:1-14. In this code, unless a different meaning plainly is required:
a. "Statute" includes the Constitution and a local law or ordinance of a political subdivision of the State;
b. "Act" or "action" means a bodily movement whether voluntary or involuntary;
c. "Omission" means a failure to act;



A copy of Blogger Terms of Service violations is here
Please consider this my good faith attempt to request you remove objectionable content immediately.
Sincerely,

Shannon Stoy
Editor In Chief
Blinkoncrime.com

Cc: Janet Fries, Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
1500 K Street, NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005 202.842.8800 (main) 202.842.8465 (fax)

George S. Kounoupis, Hahalis & Kounoupis
20 East Broad Street
Bethlehem, PA 18018
Telephone: (610) 865-2608
Facsimile: (610) 691-8418

Sean Henady, 3 View Search Services
Mandy Albritton, 3 View Search Services

NOTE: If you have received a similar email and would like it posted please send it in, I will be glad to post it for discussion.

Blink; you've been blogged

216 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 216 of 216
Anonymous said...

Jr wasn't arrested because burning down a ramshackled building is alot different than attempting to burn down a residence, my dear.
The owner of the chicken house mostly likely was happy to get rid of the eye sore and didn't want to pursue charges. The building had zero value so if you all are going to try and conjure up insurance fraud don't bother.
I know this is hard for half wits to grasp so don't even try. Just keep ohhhh and ahhhhh on the 2 B's sites. We all are getting a big kick out of your uneducated and ignorant comments.

Anonymous said...

Ok, so now (no thanks to Blink) we know that psychics have been heavily involved in this case, including Luke with the stick. So the million dollar question is..............where is Christine?????? Come on...these have to be good psychics, they work with Blink and have their own websites! Are they keeping it a secret???

jmmb said...

HOMEGROWN:
What if the side that does not like the hateful comments the most just stopped posting on this site? Wonder if some of it would go away?

Homegrown left this comment but I could not get it to post.
However, it is a wonderful question? What if?

Anonymous said...

"They" claim not to like hateful comments, but from Day 1 had problems keeping their own mouths shut. They have never been known to take the high road.

Lynn couldn't wait to tell everyone the mooch comment Mike McDermott is supposed to have made. That backfired on her, because what most are thinking is if the shoe fits.........

jmmb said...

HOMEGROWN SAID:What if the side that does not like the hateful comments the most just stopped posting on this site? Wonder if some of it would go away?

Homegrown I am sorry I could not get you comment to post for some reason. But you do have a very good point.

Anonymous said...

Blink has never posted anything that could be considered as "evidence".

Anonymous said...

Blink wouldn't know the meaning of "evidence" if it bit her on the ass.
Her knowledge of investigative and legal terms is nonexistant. Her interpretation of laws and statues is laughable at best. Blink is a loser, pure and simple.

Anonymous said...

Hello I4NI!! (Or JD)

Anonymous said...

Hey Blink, why don't you give a lawyer a call and get educated on the law.
Actually I would like to see her file a suit and spend a couple thousand bucks on an attorney who will ultimately fail.

Anonymous said...

The funniest would be when blink has read this goofy letter she wrote to Public Eye in open court.
Whatever lawyer she were to retain would want to crawl under the table.

Anonymous said...

It's horrible thing, but it's a shame that Lynn didn't spend 1/2 as much time raising Christine as she is spending now badmouthing people on the internet.

Anonymous said...

The extent of Blinks finacial output is a tank of gas and a room at the old twin towers.

Anonymous said...

6:40 yes it's already been determined, she doesn't have a pot to take a leak in.

Anonymous said...

Well, lets see, setting a house on fire and burning an abandon chicken house are two similar but different crimes as far as seriousness goes. Apparently there was not sufficient evidence to charge JR when it was investigated by the County Fire Marshall.

Anonymous said...

Come on now, all Blink has done is get a one sided story from Lynn, Google Pocomoke and try to link many unrelated "pieces" together. That is at the very least irresponsible. It is no wonder that so many people are upset. A real Investigator looks for connections that are more substantial.

Tricia Griffith said...

WOW. I haven't been to PPE for a while but I can see finding Christine is way down the list for Blink and her crew.

It's only gotten worse. However the Pokomoke Public Eye can say without question they have been dignified through all of this.

By the way, the poster named Coalville at blink's site? Well, I live in the small town of Coalville and my guess is Blink came up with this name to try and prove something to me like she knows where I live. *YAWN*

Let's face it, what are the odds that someone would come along and chose a user name that is the exact name of my small town?

And still no word on Christine. How sad. How sad that everything became mired in the mud of accusations thanks to Blink.

OK, stating to see things in triplicate. Goodnight.
Tricia

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 216 of 216   Newer› Newest»