I have not graced the pages of the plagiarizing blog of Blink since she un-hooked a few of her heavily chained minions and sicked them on us but the recent extremely high number of hits to PPE sparked my curiosity. Of course I found the normal ho-hum stolen articles and pictures posted as her own.
Then leading me through links I come across this piece written by the 8th wonder of the world. She is referencing the article I put up about the Mothers warning.
That letter is heartbreaking, but I have to point out that blog is part of the problem.
We uncovered a registered sex offender in an officers position who would have access to children at some of their events; that blog went on a smear campaign of me, blinkoncrime.com, and Scared Monkeys as a result of us disclosing that information.
Most recently, the incident I mention above, regarding Scott Mitchell's failure to arrest a child rapist, was also defended by this blog.
How is it the author thinks he can have it both ways? Complete hypocracy, imo
I do not want to make Sarah's thread about issues involving other cases, I just want to point out their is a responsibility on behalf of blogs/forums to take a stand against crimes against children whomever they are perpetrated by.
What were the conditions of this guys bond and were they being enforced?
Why would someone that boast about being so concerned inject her own hate into the death/murder of a sweet innocent child?
Not only does she reach down real low but she lied about PPE also.
1) Did not "uncover a registered sex offender in an officers position" what she did was use that to accuse the PVFD of a conspiracy.
2) PPE never "smeared" the SM forum, they banned me because I am friends with one of their enemies. PERIOD!
3) I never defended "Scott Mitchell" I questioned his guilt, still no charges have been brought against Scott Mitchell, I am not the judge or jury. We have a legal system in place. Who is Blink to define the guilt of another?
4) The all mighty "B" does not believe serving a child murderer the death penalty is justice, this liberal stance does explain a lot. I reckon she wants then to be supported in the comfort of modern prisons for the remainder of their miserable lives while enjoying rec-rooms, color TV, heat and air-conditioning 24/7, 3 nutritious meals while we pay for their worthless ass with tax dollars.
5) Blink is a proven plagiarizing, fraud, a liar that has abandon her own children to fend for themselves, or were they taken?
6) I left you alone "B"... you want it? you got it.
I can and will fill in the blanks +